AI is changing how Australian business works. The ones who do it properly will compound the advantage.
Seven verticals · One operating standard · Published compliance content
Same standard. Tuned to your regulator.
We know your tender timelines, PI renewal questions, and what your licensee will ask.
Each vertical gets its own delivery playbook — the specific regulator that watches it,
the recent letters and findings we're tracking, and the AI exposure patterns we see in that industry.
Same SKUs across verticals. The compliance overlay changes by industry.
EVISENT // VERTICALS 7 REGULATORS TRACKED
Who watches your industry
DELIVERY PLAYBOOK · PER VERTICAL
- Accounting TPB · ATO
- Financial Advisors ASIC REP 798
- Insurance Brokers APRA CPS 230
- Construction Privacy Act · IP
- Manufacturing EU AI Act · OT
- Legal LIV · OAIC
SKUS UNIFORM · COMPLIANCE OVERLAY PER VERTICAL
Important framing
Industries pages exist for the things that are industry-specific — regulators, tender practices, PI exposure, sector-specific scenarios. The AI Readiness Sprint and Build & Operate engagements themselves are industry-flexible — the SKUs are the same across verticals. If your industry isn't listed below, scroll to the bottom — most non-listed verticals still fit our model.
Six industries. One operating standard.
TPB ATO Privacy Act CA ANZ / CPA
"AI is already in your firm. The TPB doesn't care that nobody approved it."
Senior associates pasting client P&L data into ChatGPT for variance analysis. Junior staff drafting client emails through AI without traceable provenance. The TPB's competence and confidentiality obligations apply to AI use — no grace period.
Anchor · TPB Code + ATO data
ASIC APRA (downstream) Privacy Act FASEA
"ASIC found 50% of licensees have no AI policy. Privacy Act ADM rules commence 10 Dec 2026."
Advisers using ChatGPT or Claude to draft SOA paragraphs. Practice management software adding AI-powered "insights" that influence advice. Licensees demanding AI governance evidence; ARs having no answer.
Anchor · ASIC REP 798 + ADM transparency
APRA CPS 230 ASIC Privacy Act PI insurers
"APRA named four AI governance failures in April 2026. As a material supplier, you're in scope."
Quote engines and renewal automation introducing AI features brokers don't control. Claims-side AI tools used without audit trails. Underwriters demanding AI usage evidence at binder renewal — brokers having no answer.
Anchor · APRA April 2026 letter
AHPRA Privacy Act OAIC State Health Departments
"AHPRA puts personal responsibility on practitioners for any AI used in practice."
AI clinical scribes and transcription tools introducing accuracy concerns. Decision-support AI that may influence diagnosis. Practitioners personally responsible for AI appropriateness, data governance, and informed consent.
Anchor · AHPRA AI guidance + ADM transparency
Privacy Act Fair Work WHS Client contracts
"Your tender data doesn't belong in ChatGPT. Your subcontractor agreements don't either."
Estimators pasting tender bills of quantity into ChatGPT for variance checks. AI used to summarise subcontractor agreements. Major-project clients writing AI usage representations into head-contract terms.
Anchor · Tender contractual representations
EU AI Act Privacy Act Supply chain OT security
"If you export to the EU, the EU AI Act high-risk obligations land 2 August 2026."
Production-line vision systems from vendors who can't articulate AI governance. Predictive maintenance models on data the manufacturer doesn't have clear rights over. EU customers asking pre-supply AI governance questions Australian manufacturers can't answer.
Anchor · EU AI Act extraterritoriality
Also supported
Legal practices
Law Society VLSB PI insurers
Handa & Mallick is the leading Australian cautionary case. PI insurers introducing AI exclusions on renewal. We support modern, AI-curious firms — implicit pre-qualification on intake.
Three engagements. Real Australian businesses.
Anonymised but real — the findings, the numbers, and the response patterns are exactly what we see across mid-market and SMB engagements. Click through for the full write-up of each.
◉ BUILD · IN PRODUCTION
Inbox manager · 15 hrs back per month, per person
Power Automate + Anthropic Claude. Every incoming email classified into one of seven intents; drafts replies for the time-sensitive ones. Running in production.
Read the full case study →
◉ M365 AUDIT · MAY 2026
Wholesale · $4,070 saved + 7 high-severity findings
35-staff Australian SMB. Brief was cost optimisation — we delivered that and surfaced security findings the client didn't know they had.
Read the full case study →
◉ BEC INCIDENT · CONTAINED
Healthcare BEC · contained by 6 AM
607 phishing emails to 560 recipients in 48 minutes. Hidden inbox rule, US IP rotation, classic BEC playbook. Detected, contained, and remediated through the night.
Read the full case study →
ANONYMISATION FOLLOWS A WRITTEN CHECKLIST. CLIENT NAMES NEVER USED. NUMBERS AND FINDINGS PRESERVED. ASK FOR INDUSTRY-SPECIFIC EXAMPLES — info@evisent.com.au
Fixed scope. Your regulator's overlay. One delivery team.
Sprint and Build & Operate engagements are uniform across verticals — the compliance overlay is tuned to the regulator that watches you. Start where it makes sense.